Let's say that Littlefoot, for whatever reason, was willing to admit he broke the rules in II and actually told them the truth: that they went after Egg Stealers to try and make themselves look grown up, that they thought they took back Ducky's sibling's egg but had grabbed a Sharptooth egg and that it had turned out to be a Sharptooth egg?
He'd also point out that Chomper didn't seem dangerous and hadn't tried to hurt him, despite having a few chances to do so.
Do you think their response would have been:
1.) To tell Littlefoot that he has a wild imagination (i.e. they wouldn't believe him)
2.) They'd demand to be shown where Chomper is so they could kill him.
(If this happens, which of the following 2 scenarios do you think would happen?)
2..a) Littlefoot would openly criticize that decision and make a very profound statement that killing Chomper, when he is so young, is no better, and perhaps worse, than the older Sharpteeth that only kill leaf eaters for food. And he'd refuse to help them find Chomper, perhaps hiding him from them or even fleeing the Great Valley with him to save his life.
2.b.) He'd just accept their decision and feel like an idiot for telling.
3.) They'd realize that it would be wrong to kill Chomper, but would say that having a Sharptooth in the Great Valley is dangerous and would insist on showing Chomper to the exit?
4.) They'd help hide Chomper and then things would proceed as normal as they did in the movie?
5.) They'd have called a meeting with the other adults and insisted that Chomper, as long as he doesn't hurt anyone, can stay.
