The Gang of Five
The forum will have some maintenance done in the next couple of months. We have also made a decision concerning AI art in the art section.


Please see this post for more details.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - GreyLizard226

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
21

In movie number three, there was a problem in the Great Valley- a lack of water. The adults handled this by arguing for an extended period of time, which accomplished nothing. The kids also had a problem- their peers, or, the bullies, were heading into danger. Littlefoot did not hesitate, left the valley, then saved the mean teenagers. So, in retrospection, the adults couldn’t handle their problem while the kids jumped right into theirs and solved it. Isn’t that teaching kids that careful planning is a waste of time and rushing into danger is the solution? Furthermore, it might make kids not worry about being reckless, as their parents will just fix everything. I mean, I once made a thread in this section comparing The Lion King to The Land Before Time. Well, here’s a difference, making The Lion King’s example of this more appropriate for developing minds.

In The Lion King, Simba recklessly charges into the unknown, and because of that, he was nearly killed. The gang of five was also nearly killed for wandering off. So what was the difference, you ask? Simba got a royal scolding from his father. Mufasa gave a huge lecture that taught kids what can happen if you head into danger. The adults in The Land Before Time? Hm. “This is no time to go exploring.” Really? Is that all? Just like the adults failed to respond to a problem, they failed to chide their children and reveal just how wrong it was for them to leave like that. Hyp got reprimanded the worst, but the only complaint his father made about him leaving was that his departure was a distraction to solving the water problem. “Duh, dad?” “Yeah?” “I’m going to enter a near death situation.” “Nah, don’t do that! It might distract me!” The full concept of the danger was never passed down from parent to child. The parents simply took care of the sharpteeth, and all was fine. So, kids were glorified as being the ideal characters and the authority and wisdom of adults was thrashed in this film by making it seem like not planning is the way to get things done, and doing dangerous things will simply cause your parents to bail you out. Did the head writer have parent issues…?


Interesting analysis. Time of the Great Giving is one of my all-time favorite LBT films along with 5, 9 and 14. I agree that the adults weren’t depicted in a great light, but I don’t really think “isn’t that teaching kids…?” when watching it, since LBT isn’t a standard edutainment series—-like what you find on PBS)—-I’m not going to necessarily be immediately be thinking, “Oh, that’s such a bad example!”. I mean, take something like Caillou. Since it’s a show about a human character and the stories are very short, that’s obviously the kind of thing where I’m going to notice when there’s a botched moral.

Anyways, you went and compared it to TLK, and I don’t think it’s a completely fair comparison. In the case of LBT 3, Littlefoot and the gang only nearly got themselves killed in order to save the bullies. Yes, they could have had their parents call them out for their actions, but it was a bit of a different case than TLK (in which the main character heads into danger out of pure arrogance), and the focus of the scene is on how Hyp’s dad is a pretty crappy parent who, as you mentioned, only seems upset that his son caused an inconvenience rather than almost died.  (Either way, TLK is a really overrated movie imo, I know a lot of people like it but there are way too many problems with it for me.)

In the end, I think that despite it’s flaws, LBT 3’s underlying message of teamwork and generosity compensates for it’s portrayal of Generation X, and I think that can even be interpreted as a way of teaching kids that adults can and will make mistakes, and don’t always have the answers kids are looking for. Either way, LBT 3 is still one of my faves.




The kids were like John Smith from Disney’s Pocahontas, the tinysauruses were the Indians, and the adults were the other white men. Both groups could not accept the other on equal terms and wanted to be as far away from each other as possible. The white men (the LBT grownups) wanted to drive away the Indians (the tinysauruses) while John Smith (the kids) found peace with both sides at once. Whoa, hold the phone. This isn’t LIKE the Pocahontas movie. It IS the Pocahontas movie. The savages song from Pocahontas is just like the creepy crawlies song from the LBT movie. I can just see the director, trying to think of a plot for movie eleven, then his little daughter tugs on his pants and asks him to watch a movie with her. He refuses for days, then finally accepts, having found no ideas. As he watches Pocahontas, his eyes lights up, and he calls the writer team up. Sadly, the father never finishes the movie with his daughter. I mean, seriously, the plot theme was just like that Disney movie


I’m sorry…what…? :confused

22
I know I’m going to get a ton of flack for saying this.

But yeah, I’m sorry, I find him kind of annoying. It’s partially the voice, partially the dialogue, and partially the fact that he just comes off as kind of stupid. I mean, he’s so desperate to create a paradise (something he KNOWS already exists, since we first meet him in the Great Valley) that he resorts to kidnapping and all that. I don’t know, I just don’t care for him. I admit that even though the last scene with him is pretty rough (I can’t imagine what it must be like for a fan of the character to watch it 23 years later when he still hasn’t been brought back), I’m still a bit frustrated by him in it. I would have personally had him say goodbye to Petrie and the rest outside the Great Valley and have his exile be self-imposed, showing he recognizes his actions have cost him the chance to be a part of the community.

Like I said, I’m probably one of the only people here who isn’t a fan of him, but honestly, I don’t mind having a non-standard opinion, in fact I really like it. And I especially like being able to share it.  :Mo

23
Maybe I’ve been too hard on Petrie in a lot of these movies. I guess part of the reason is I find his voice being pitch-shifted (?) makes him sound too whiny in my opinion, and the transition to digital coloring didn’t suit him. I guess it’s not enough to really define his character by, but I felt one of his two “spotlight” movies (LBT 7) was one of his weaker ones, unfortunately.

24
General Land Before Time / Re: NEW LBT SCRIPT FOUND!!
« on: June 02, 2023, 12:34:21 AM »
Well, I’m kind of glad that it’s near identical to the final film, since like I said, it was very unlikely that whatever this script was like, I would like it more or even as much as that first draft. On the other hand, it’s cool to see what the scripts look like before the songs are written.

25
General Land Before Time / Re: NEW LBT SCRIPT FOUND!!
« on: June 01, 2023, 03:17:14 AM »
ANOTHER LBT 6 script??   :GuidoAAAAAHHHHHH

To be honest I’m kind of disappointed, since we already have an early LBT 6 script that’s FANTASTIC, imo (really, they should have kept the film exactly like that script was, no changes should have been made at all!), and would love to see a script of 3, 5, 9, or 14, since I felt those were the sequels that stood out to me.

Still, it’s going to be interesting to see, once again, how LBT 6 could have gone. I highly doubt it will live up to the high standards of the first script we got (if it has Cera’s cousins in it, it  will immediately get a vastly inferior score in my book). But it will still be fun to compare it to the final film, and to see how much either one is an improvement over the other.

26
Ranks 30-21
We begin the top 25 with another one of the nastier characters.  Ozzy, the worse of the two Egg Stealers from Great Valley Adventure, had 10 minutes and 38 seconds of screen time.  This villain, like Sierra, had no remorse, and he took pleasure in eating eggs containing unborn fetuses of baby dinosaurs, much like an unhealthy drug addiction.  We can all be very happy that we never saw any of that on screen, otherwise Great Valley Adventure would surely have ended up with a PG rating, even if kids were interested in dinosaurs, including ones who may have eaten other dinosaurs' eggs.  Also, like Sierra, he, too, wanted to kill Littlefoot in cold blood.  However, when Chomper tried to stop Strut from throwing Littlefoot off the Great Wall to his death, Ozzy made his fatal mistake by grabbing the baby Sharptooth and attempting to choke him.  This was witnessed by his parents, who proceeded to snap at him and Strut, and pursue them out of the Great Valley, unwittingly saving Littlefoot in the process.  Ozzy was definitely a psychopath, but not on the same level as Sierra was.  I still think the Flyer was a lot worse than this Egg Stealer.

I’m thinking that you and I have slightly different opinions on Ozzy. While I’m not going to deny that he’s a villain (trying to kill the kids as petty revenge puts him on the same level as the original sharptooth, depending on how you view him), but I don’t agree with your quote “he took pleasure in eating eggs containing unborn fetuses of baby dinosaurs, much like an unhealthy drug addiction”. His kind simply eat eggs to survive, I don’t see that as something resembling a drug addiction anymore. I mean, Chomper’s parents surely eat other dinosaurs, but they’re not evil. Also, the fact that Ozzy is constantly cheated out of his meal made him relatively sympathetic to me, sort of in the same way as Sylvester from Looney Tunes. I felt he only really shows signs of being a psychopath towards the end, when he tries to kill Littlefoot and Chomper in cold blood, and while that’s still is inexcusable, it only after he’s spent the rest of the movie being extremely unlucky.

For much of the movie, I felt what made Ozzie really qualify as a “villain” was how he treated Strutt, something you didn’t even mention. Strutt is worth mentioning, too. For most of the movie, he hardly qualifies as a villain at all. The only time he does comes at the end (being part of the murdering plan), and that felt too uncharacteristic to really be believable. I’m guessing that being constantly bullied by Ozzy (who’s presumably all he has)  made him a little too desperate to gain Ozzie’s respect. Coupled with the fact that Ozzie had apparently stopped thinking rationally by the end of the movie and had become truly evil, and Strutt himself suddenly turning evil is a little more believable. Again, I’m not going to say it justifies him being evil, but it at least makes it a little more sense to me, since unlike Ozzie, I don’t feel that there was really anything before the bit where Littlefoot is kidnapped to suggest Strutt was a bully, much less a full-on villain.

Anyways, Ozzie is one of my favorite villains in the series, so I’m probably a tad biased towards him. But at least we can agree that he wasn’t as bad as Sierra.

27
But you called him a “cowardly flightless nobody” in the original and basically said that he was unlikeable before LBT 7. So being a smaller sidekick character meant nothing in 1-6?

Just to clarify that, he wasn't a "cowardly flightless nobody" in MY eyes, but rather in the eyes of most other characters except the Gang, particularly in Flyer society.  My unfinished Petrie prequel story goes all in on this, stating that Petrie's inability to fly would surely have been considered a shameful disgrace in the eyes of other Flyers prior to the events of the first movie.

Okay, thanks for letting me know.

28

In a way, I see Petrie as a diamond in the rough, since I have a soft spot for smaller sidekick characters who get their occasional moment in the spotlight, which Petrie did in the 12th film.

But you called him a “cowardly flightless nobody” in the original and basically said that he was unlikeable before LBT 7. So being a smaller sidekick character meant nothing in 1-6?

29
This draft is SO much better than the actual thing, imo. It’s very frustrating to know that LBT was meant to be much more than Universal has allowed it to be.

30
General Land Before Time / Re: Asking the creators for info on LBT 15.
« on: March 16, 2023, 05:08:34 PM »
Wow, thanks for sharing!

This line really stands out to me: “ Most of my connection to any writer is a name on a script.  That any truly good writing gets done in any area of entertainment actually amazes me, considering how many hands the script goes through before I get it, and then the story is changed and refined dozens of times after it leaves my hands.  ”

That reminds me of the fact that some years ago an early draft of the script for LBT 6 surfaced, and it was MUCH better than the final product. When you think about it, most LBT films have interesting premises or storylines, but the writing is often awkward and feels like something intended to be a cash-grab. I feel if the films suffered less from executive meddling, they would probably be way more passable as actual movies. It would be interesting to know what some of the other ones were originally going to be like.

31
General Land Before Time / Asking the creators for info on LBT 15.
« on: March 16, 2023, 03:18:56 AM »
Has anyone thought of getting in touch with any one involved in JOTB to see if there’s any plans for an LBT 15 ever happening? Who knows, maybe if they they know there are interested fans out there, it will spark desire among the creators to produce more LBT-related material.

32
Ranks 30-21


We begin the top 25 with another one of the nastier characters.  Ozzy, the worse of the two Egg Stealers from Great Valley Adventure, had 10 minutes and 38 seconds of screen time.  This villain, like Sierra, had no remorse, and he took pleasure in eating eggs containing unborn fetuses of baby dinosaurs, much like an unhealthy drug addiction.  We can all be very happy that we never saw any of that on screen


Honestly, I kind of felt sorry for Ozzie. Yes, I know he went too far in trying to murder the kids, but I think he gets a much worse reputation for his diet than he deserves. Saying “he took pleasure in eating eggs containing unborn fetuses” in too harsh. Animals in the wild will eat eggs that are unborn fetuses of other animals. I don’t see how Ozzie is any worse because of that, much less an addict.

33

They ended up bringing bad luck to the Great Valley as they were the ones who broke Saurus Rock,

Whaaaaattttt…??? There actually WAS a curse?  :GuidoAAAAAHHHHHH

From what I remember, it was left ambiguous whether there ever was a curse. And I’m almost 100% certain there wasn’t.

34
1988 Theatrical Release / Re: I think this "uncut version" obsession
« on: March 11, 2023, 06:39:38 PM »
I mean there are cut scenes from the film online. Like the now well always be together ending and some others like ducky making faces and littlefoot crashing into the sharptooths foot. but I believe probably the reason why most of the scenes aren't or cant be released is because there mainly just storyboards.   
Many of them were animated, actually, not just storyboards. The only ones that probably weren't animated was the "Littlefoot and the Snake" scene as well as the Oasis scene.

There aren’t a lot of animated films I’m aware of with deleted scenes that aren’t just storyboards. I remember looking through the special features on the DVD for “The Incredibles” since there were supposedly deleted scenes on it, and was disappointed that they were just black-and-white storyboards.

35
Today I read something very interesting in a thread.

“ fPetrie started off the series as a cowardly, flightless nobody who annoyed many film critics with his poor attempts at being the comic relief.  However, the sequels slowly improved his character over the years until he became a very likeable character by the time Stone of Cold Fire came out”

I honestly feel the exact opposite. I liked Petrie in the original, but feel he gradually became worse over the course of the sequels. Bizarre, huh? (Although I feel maybe he was finally starting to improve with Journey Of The Brave.)

I don’t know how everyone feels about Petrie, but it would be interesting to know if there are others who feel as strongly about him one way or the other.

36
fPetrie started off the series as a cowardly, flightless nobody who annoyed many film critics with his poor attempts at being the comic relief.  However, the sequels slowly improved his character over the years until he became a very likeable character by the time Stone of Cold Fire came out.


Whaaaattt….? :wow

I honestly thought Petrie started off good but got worse as the series progressed. I might have to make a topic about this to see what everyone thinks.

37
Okay, everyone.  After thoroughly analyzing the movie frame-by-frame multiple times and having to re-watch infamous, cringe-worthy scenes (some of them no less than five times), I have the results for each character's screen time for the original Land Before Time!

Fair warning: I ended up discovering a startling surprise that may make us all never look at this movie the same way again ...






No, your eyes are not deceiving you.  Even I thought for a moment that Vegas Pro had left me cross-eyed, but the editing system speaks nothing but the truth ...

Ducky has more screen time than Cera!  MORE THAN TWO MINUTES no less!  :littlefootscared

Even though Ducky was formally introduced to the audience much later than Cera, the Threehorn's absence from most of the final battle coupled with Ducky being the bait for Sharptooth essentially allowed the Swimmer to overtake the Threehorn for second place in screen time.

Rooter was on screen for only 73 seconds, but that was all he needed to deliver his powerful message about the great Circle of Life.

I was honestly expecting slightly bigger numbers for Sharptooth, but given that a big chunk of scenes ended up being cut from the movie, I guess it's no wonder his screen time was cut down to just over 4 minutes.

As for the siblings, those are credited as a combination of the siblings from each of the Gang's families.  The only reason I counted them was because they are related to the main characters, even though Cera's siblings will never be seen again (their shared combination of 14 seconds ALL during Cera's hatching scene, shockingly).  Ducky's siblings never really become supporting characters, either, but we know very well that Petrie's siblings eventually will.  :petrienotamused

Littlefoot's grandparents were just utterly confusing throughout the time I studied their scenes.  This is actually the only film in the series where they have the scientifically correct coloring (based on gender), as these were mysteriously swapped out from the second movie onward.  Their numbers were simply based on assumption after I decided to go with my gut.

Of course, though, Littlefoot is unsurprisingly far ahead of everyone, his screen time almost doubling that of the runner-up.  It should be noted, though, that most of the movie was essentially being seen through his perspective, so it should come as no surprise that Littlefoot the fearless Longneck leader of the Gang starts off the series seated on the throne as Screen Time King.  The question is, though, will he stay up there throughout the entire series given just how many sequels there are?

That's all for now, though.  I'll see you later with my next post, where we dissect the characters' screen time in The Land Before Time II: The Great Valley Adventure!  :)petrie

Wow, this is really cool! Great work!

Just a note about Cera’s siblings, it’s not impossible that they won’t be seen again. I think a few of them appeared in movie 3.

38
General Land Before Time / Re: Most Disliked LBT Movie
« on: March 10, 2023, 02:34:32 PM »
Wow someone voted the original.

39
Character Showcase / Re: Petrie Showcase - June 2019
« on: November 26, 2022, 05:54:13 PM »
First of all, nice pic @DiddyKF1!

Alright, it's Petrie! Everyone's favorite third-person speaker and quivering flyer. Like Ducky, he has a goofy speech impediment which lends him much, much endearment.

I've mentioned this before and even chatted with Sovereign about this once on Discord, but I'll say it again: I personally prefer Jeff Bennett over Will Ryan as Petrie, so much so that the very depiction of Petrie that many of the more enthusiastic fans tend to remember is Bennett and the sequels' take on him — compare "My name Petrie!" in the first film compared to "Me Petrie!" in pretty much all the sequels. There's just something about his more broken English and more childish (and pouty at times) voice in the later sequels just makes him more endearing, and it's usually this more-broken squeaky speech that we remember fondly about him.

Perhaps part of the reason that is so is because the pacing of the first LBT after its script was cut all over the place does not lend itself well to Petrie. Significantly, he lacks a hatch scene when everyone else has one, which means he first appears almost halfway in the film's runtime as a result, and he tends to share scenes with Ducky, who usually steals his thunder as a result. He does get a spectacular end scene with Sharptooth where he learns how to fly at last, but that is probably his singular standout magnum opus scene in the whole film. He's not bad per se, he just doesn't stick out as much.

Petrie in general gets a whole lot more development and the chance to shine in the numerous sequel films, especially in Stone of Cold Fire and Great Day of the Flyers where they delve into his history and relationship with his family. In fact, in the sequels in general, they focus on the entire gang as a whole, which coupled with his newfound kinda-overpowered flight as well as his family finally gives him quite the spotlight. Him being the sole one able to fly usually grants him special scenes where the others rely on his aerial abilities. And like countless others have said before me, they also take his trait of being brave when the situation demands for it from the first film and use it in spades. For being such a lovable coward, he really faces up to his fears quite a lot! Seeing those scenes where his face and voice turns determined is always a spectacle to behold.

So yeah, my perspective of Petrie has improved significantly over the years, to the point where he's now my favorite of the whole bunch. In fact, I relate to him a lot — I'm dead terrified of ghosts, heights, and lightning too. So, uh, may the winds be with you forevermore, Petrie!

Interesting analysis. I’ve always liked Petrie better in the original film, feeling that even with more chance for development in the sequels, he’s just too annoying. Part of it is his design, which I feel got really weak over the years (the GIF at the top for example, which shows the size of his head as too disproportionate to his body), and his voice (which became too whiny and childlike; if they wanted to make his voice sound more like a kid’s, why have an adult male voice him?); but also, I feel a lot of the time he contributes the least in the sequels, besides the occasional laugh. In the original, this was okay, because it needed that kind of levity. But with the change in tone, and Petrie’s newfound ability to fly, I feel taking the character more seriously was a necessary step that the sequels often fail to do. Even the ones that focus on Petrie more tend to make him rather whiny and even a little stupid at times.

As the member of the gang I fell in love with in the original, though, he’s still technically my favorite, and I feel Journey Of The Brave was quite a bit of an improvement on him, espicially compared to the other later sequels.

40
1988 Theatrical Release / Re: Changes you would have made to the film
« on: November 26, 2022, 05:42:17 PM »
That Littlefoot’s Treestar that he was given by his mom wasn’t trampled.
Yeah, that part was pretty sad.

Then again, it was likely going to shrivel up and disintegrate in the end because no one would eat it. How would you have made Littlefoot let it go?

It would have been nice if he laid it in river in the Great Valley and watch it float away, and the rest of the Gang comes to Littlefoot and asks to play and he transitions to his new life in the Valley. 
That's...actually a pretty good idea.

Thanks. I think it would have been a nicer send off to Momma Longneck’s Treestar. Sharptooth trampling it kinda feels like an excessive insult, I mean he killed Littlefoot’s mom and then destroys his only memento from her.

Well, we don’t know for 100% sure it’s the same treestar. But if it is, Littlefoot getting rid of it just doesn’t seem right. I mean, I guess in real life it would shrivel up. But when you have an artistic license, why not make use of it? Since Petrie also has a memento he brought to the valley, I think it works.

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5