Oh yeah, I didn't.
Well, for #2 and #5, I'd definitely not have avoided the whole ackward situation about Chomper being a sharptooth, the way both Smith and Grovenor did. They did go over a bit, but not in the deapth I was hoping, even at ages 9 and 12.
Plus, I've increasingly become less and less tolerant of musical cartoons. I'd probably have done allt he sequels in the story-structure style of the original. Although I do love the first three sequels.
For #6. Well...the character Doc was well handled, but that was about it. Plus, I felt like I was watching a rip-off of "The Lone Ranger". Something I did not appreciate. And, NO COUNTRY MUSIC SINGING DINOSAURS!!!!!!!! And the whole "Bad Luck" theme (and song) drove me nuts.
For #7, Could they have given Petrie's uncle a less annoying and melodramatic voice? Plus, I'm no fan of Michael York. Someone like Alan Rickman or Tim Curry might have given Pterano more presence as a villain. Petrie was a bit too fascinated and fooled by his uncle for my tastes. Petrie may not be the brightest bult in the box, but I'd always given him more credit than the filmmakers did in this one. The two other villains were too annoying and it seemed like they trying to copy both Scrut and Ozie and Ril and Itchy with those two. Plus, they left no impression on me. Scrut and Ozie, Dil and Itchy, and the sharpteeth had credibility as villains. Not these two. Don't even get me started on the Rainbow faces...
For #8, actually, it wasn't too bad, but that new spiketail, whatever his name was, drove me nuts! The story was more well-handled than in the previous attempts.
For #9, actually, I have no problems with this one.
For #10, I have no serious problems with this one, other than how Bron was handled. Bron, I don't think, was a bad character, just a victem of bad writing.
For #11, I haven't seen it enough to times to remember everything like I can with the others yet.