Well guess what? I saw Avatar in 3D and Dark Knight in 2D. Guess which one I had better time at? That's right: Dark Knight.

Well, that's one thing we can agree on. Dark Knight was a much better film. I'll be the first to freely agree that good plot is far, far more important than good looks (although Dark Knight wasn't exactly shabby!), but that doesn't mean visuals don't have their place. All I'm saying is that if we could combine the two then we'd be rocking.
If you don't like the way 3D looks right now then....well, okay. It's nowhere perfected yet, but I have hopes that one day they will bring it up on par with regular vision; at which point I'd assume you'd be happy with it?

Back on topic: I'd see LBT in 3D, but I highly doubt it would work. The animation style....you know. I wince at just the current CGI-ish scenes. Doesn't really work for me.

No, he said that films about the visual experience and can just be eye candy. He also said if he was worried about story, he'd a read a book.

I said if I was solely concerned with plot and characters I'd read a book rather than go see a film, and often that is indeed the case; I actually read a lot more than I watch. But there are times when I want a visual aspect as well, and that's when I hit the cinema (or more usually our rental outlet in reality).

Also, 3D is not a big leap in the visual experience. They're moving cardboard cut-outs in front of a background. Nothing more.

I think it's a little more sophisticated than that; even you're a big hater of 3D, I can't quite understand how you can claim it doesn't look amazing. I mean, I only very vaguely enjoyed Avatar because of the terribly-written characters (and it dragged...on...and on...), but I still have to admit that it is one of the most gorgeous-looking films I've ever seen.

And if any of you would bother to read my post, 3D GRAPHICS F*****G MY F*****G EYES!

I understand skim-reading other people's posts, I really do; when one has other things to do and there are a few topics one wants to get a reply in, but when you're complaining this badly about other people doing it, I'd think it would be best to check you're not doing it first:

New improvements to 3D are being made all the time, which one day should alleviate the pain it causes your eyes.

Sure I would. People today see 3D in films the way I guess people once saw colour in films (And maybe even sound, or indeed just moving images?). You don't need 3D, colour, sound, or even images to tell a story, it's perfectly true, but that doesn't mean they don't have their place. 3D isn't any different from those other examples in my opinion. It's not a "gimmick", it's just bringing the picture quality closer to reality (the problem, I suspect, is the unfortunately well-founded belief that sometimes 3D causes focus to shift from plot to eye-candy, which isn't good, but isn't the fault of 3D technology itself).
EDIT:

Wait, are we speaking of 3D with these glasses or a completely 3D animated movie?

Does the technology for 3D without special eyewear even commercially exist for film?

Okay, but if it had a higher budget than the first land before time, why didn't anyone even consider a sequel.

Well, if I was a film producer, I would prefer films that are cheap to make yet still sell well. That way you make more money.

....and the antiderivative of 4x will always be 2x^2 + C.

Is "antiderivative" a regular term, or would I be the odd one out to call that the "indefinite integral"? (Although, admittedly, "antiderivative" is a little more intuitive...).

As for the cheating thing, basically, on a number of them, every time I bid, it indicated that someone had bid higher than me.  I actually tried to get the lead by putting in one that was at $52 and giving a $60 bid, but the same thing happened.

You know, I'm pretty sure that that's the way eBay is meant to work...

That is really cool; who was selling them?
And what do mean by "cheating" on eBay? The size they are, I would've thought they'd have measures against that kind of thing.

Where'd you get the idea for the title? It's a little...unusual.

The Glowing Sky Stone is a hoak title fot the 14th movie. It's already been proven false, so I wouldn't waste your time looking for anything about it.

By "hunt" I don't mean "look". I mean coming at it out of the sun with my trigger-finger itching on the delete button.

As I write these two are playing their 95th game of the fifth set. Incredible stuff; anyone else watching them?
EDIT: 100th...
EDIT2: 59 - 59 games in the final set, and the match has just been suspended due to bad light. Going into a third day tomorrow.