It's the same earthquake; by the time Bron finds where the nest originally was while the earthquake is happening, Littlefoot, his mother, and his grandparents had already began to travel to find the Great Valley, having long since abandoned the original nest in hopes of instead finding the Great Valley before things had gotten worse. Considering Bron wasn't mentioned at all in the original film, Bron's presence in the 10th movie would be a retcon of the original plot regarding Littlefoot's family.

In the original film, Littlefoot, his mother, and grandparents were the only survivors of that particular herd of longnecks; no mention of a father for Littlefoot is given, and the subject of this is never brought up as if Littlefoot's father was either dead or simply not important by that point in the original film. When Movie 10 happens, we learn that Bron does indeed exist and is indeed alive and thus his existence causes a bit of a retcon to the original film by making it so that he's the missing father of Littlefoot who was simply absent entirely from the events of the original film.

That's sadly the best way I can explain it I'm afraid.

Unfortunately you are wrong with this one I'm afraid. Sometimes the most obvious choice here isn't exactly the correct one, you see. Try again.

Davy Jones pulling Sharptooth into his iconic locker? Could be, considering the size of the body of water they tried to drown him in kept constantly changing in size between a small puddle to a rather deep lake at odd times.

Mine is a play on the name "LadiesMan217" from the first live-action Transformers film. Instead of LadiesMan217, I decided to use a snow clone called "MightyFan217", which is based off the fact I'm a huge fan of a character named Mighty from the Bomberman Jetters anime based off of the Bomberman franchise. Mighty is Shirobon's older brother and has the look of a genuinely kindhearted person despite being a legitimately competent hero, considering his look makes him look like a tough character, but the fact he can look so legitimately gentle and caring is astounding considering how good of a person he truly is.

Well, despite the problem of breakable weapons, (That is NOT a good thing of the game!  Stop defending it, Zelda Fanbase!)

Alright I haven't played Breath of the Wild, but I feel I need to add my own two cents here. Let me bust out my favorite MMO of all time and one of my personal favorite open world type of games in the form of Nexon's Mabinogi to use an example for this. Mabinogi has a durability system much like Breath of the Wild, but how quickly you consume durability points on a weapon depends on what type of skills you're using with the weapon or equipment in question. The problem that every person claiming Breath of the Wild is at fault for having breakable weapons isn't that the weapons can break at all, but rather it's how exactly Link is USING these weapons in question that causes them to break so easily. Not only that, but often times when I expect a weapon or armor to be good for me in games like Skyrim, that game's kill camera feature can often render even the strongest armor you wear to be dead useless against a joke of an enemy such as a bandit chief, primarily because no matter how strong your own armor is, kill camera finishing blows will ignore every point of armor value you have and thus creates a sense of false difficulty despite having the best stuff.

Breath of the Wild, from what I've seen in the gameplay through online videos and Let's Plays, has weapons breaking very quickly regardless of durability because the videos I've been looking at feature the Silver Lynel enemy, and basically what I've been seeing in these videos is Link activating a form of bullet time every time he dodges an attack from the Silver Lynel and rapidly striking the Silver Lynel with multiple slashes in the span of probably less than a few seconds in real time. Due to the near superhuman speed he's hacking and slashing away at this enemy, whatever weapon he has will break incredibly easily because here's the problem most people are thinking in that weapons should be designed to be sturdy enough to deal damage and not break; that's NOT how a realistic weapon works. Increased stress on a real life weapon can either cause it to harm the wielder or at worst break in half if the applied stress on it causes it to degrade in a way it normally would. Not only that, but back to Mabinogi real quick, a very useful skill called Bash exists which can pretty much allow you to repeatedly attack and enemy and leave them completely vulnerable to spamming this skill against them til they drop dead. How does the game counterbalance this? Bash causes the durability of whatever weapon you're using to drop much faster than it would with any other skill.

Going back to another example I have, The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim, weapons do not have any durability to them... and that's exactly the problem. To train blacksmithing, you need to either pay a fee to a trainer for the skill, or craft completely brand new weapons, armor, or accessories. Why does the lack of a durability system in Skyrim ruin the game for me? You can't train the blacksmithing skill further by, say, repairing broken weapons you might have and then further refining them for increased damage output or even durability buffs. Not only that, but literally once you have all the perks, your entire set of gear will be nothing but Dragonscale Armor for Light Armor users, Daedric Armor for Heavy Armor users, and Dragonbone Weapons regardless of what kind of weapon you're ultimately using. Due to the lack of durability in Skyrim, you effectively become stagnant in progression once you have all three of those categories of stuff to use for yourself, and the game becomes less fun that way because once you have access to this specific gear, you'll pretty much never need to smith anything again unless you're wanting more Dragonbow Arrows for ammo. Combined with enchantments from the same game, even the most unique of equipment from the quest lines can be rendered useless compared to stuff you can make all on your own.

Not only that, but even though durability can be a problem in both Breath of the Wild and even worse in Mabinogi, both of these games have an immediate workaround in the form of a legendary weapon which, while having the same durability stats as other weapons in the game, can never truly break for good. I'm of course referring to Breath of the Wild's Master Sword and Mabinogi's Brionac. In Breath of the Wild, the Master Sword has a bonus to it in that not only will it deal double damage to demonic or evil entities, but it will never lose durability when in range of such entities as well, so using the Master Sword on the final boss basically gives you an infinite durability weapon. The Brionac in Mabinogi becomes useful with a previous set of skills you acquire before getting the Brionac itself; the Demigod skills associated with Neamhain, and with the one skill you get by default, Spear of Light, when wielding the Brionac becomes Spear of God, which increases the damage output of the skill to an absurd degree to which bosses in older dungeons in the game will almost guaranteed drop dead on impact of the skill, with the only exceptions being the bosses found in Peaca Dungeon, which is the hardest dungeon from the original region of the game. Even Cromm Cruaich, the final boss of Chapter 1 as a whole, will have a good 70%+ damage to his health upon impact with the skill merely once. The only true downside to the Brionac is primarily the fact to repair it, you need to spend Ability Points which you only normally get for certain quests, leveling up, or aging up once every Saturday at 12 PM PST up until Age 25+. The Brionac, much like the Master Sword in Breath of the Wild, will never truly break because unlike most weapons in Mabinogi, its maximum durability cannot be decreased.

What I'm trying to say here is that with games like Skyrim in which weapons have infinite durability regardless of type, the weapons eventually become stagnant and boring to use over and over again, and the fact most of all of the weapons are nearly interchangeable with gear you can craft yourself for superior special effects, even the game's most unique weapons and equipment will become outclassed by some of the stuff you can easily make yourself. There's ultimately no risk to using certain weapon types, and not only that, but the armor you craft can often be dead useless because often even with the strongest armor in the game, you can often get one-hit killed by bandit chiefs that have primitive weaponry compared to a late-game Dragonborn's armor and weapons. In Breath of the Wild and Mabinogi, there's an actual form of risk to the weapons you use to the point it makes you actively seek out trying other weapons or alternate means of taking out threats. Not only that, but both games also have the advantage of having a weapon which cannot be compared to any of the other weapons in the game, those being the Master Sword and Brionac respectively. Skyrim, despite being a highly acclaimed game, does not have the benefit of having a very distinct set of equipment and armor that cannot be compared to any other type of equipment you can simply make all on your own; pretty much any unique weapon you do somehow get is eventually outclassed by Dragonbone Weaponry you smith on your own.

I have both the PC and PS2 versions of the game. Often times I mod my PC copy to restrict myself to 3 dig sites just like what the PS2 version has, if merely because none of the campaigns in the whole game require you to have more than 3 dig sites at any given time. Often times when I make parks with just 3 dig sites used, I often use solely the Jurassic Period dig sites because of the fact A: the title Jurassic Park, and B: all of the Jurassic Period dig sites give you very popular animals to make use of.

Now then considering I've been personally wanting to get into contact with DarkHououmon over some things relating to DinoSquad since both of us have fanfics associated with the series that, by pure coincidence, ended up sharing ideas with each other. Most of this is just the fact the show itself had wasted potential that could've been expanded on among other things, and some of the specific wasted potential we both decided to make use of in our fanfics in the near exact same way.

But enough about that, let's get to the point; my fanfic DinoSquad RX which I've recently decided to continue work on after a lengthy delay from its original upload in February of this current year. With DinoSquad RX, I'm basically doing the same as Truth and Ideals when it came to the Pokemon anime; a complete AU/Reboot in my own image, but otherwise based primarily off of concepts already appearing in the original work.

*DinoSquad RX Cover Image, which I posted earlier in my initial post of this thread.

*Rolf "Max" Maxwell
Rolf "Max" Maxwell, in his morph of Tyrannosaurus rex. I showed this one earlier as well.
*Terri Flagstaff, in her morph of Anzu wyliei.
*Roger Blair, in his morph of Triceratops horridus.
*Irwin Caruso, in his morph of Ankylosaurus magniventris.
*Fiona Flagstaff, in her morph of Edmontosaurus annectens.
*Victor R. Dakota, in his morph of Dakotaraptor steini.
*Joanne Moynihan, in her morph of Acheroraptor temertyorum. I showed her image her earlier as well.
*Peter Richards, in his morph of Alamosaurus sanjuanensis.
*Neil Buzzmati, in his morph of Quetzalcoatlus sp.

Oh! This is going to be something to look forward to. Normally I don't watch the Cartoon Hero's stuff very often, mainly because I'm more focused on other reviewers, but I'll most certainly give his review of Journey of the Brave a watch once it is out.

...

THOUGH ADMITTEDLY, I still stand by some of my own opinions as to what exactly should've happened in the film for it to have been any actual good at all for the franchise's future. Regardless, hearing somebody else's thoughts on the film would most certainly help to mediate where exactly I stand on the film as a whole.

So before treating myself to watching The Force Awakens, I had to force myself to sit through Batman V Superman to see if there was anything remotely good about it and to finally say my thoughts on the movie in full.

I still stick to my word that Batman V Superman was made too soon. THAT, and the movie is too much of dark and gritty to be either entertaining or have a cast of relatable characters. Supes and Bats were too dour in compared to their usual selves, Wonder Woman was shoehorned in, Doomsday was wasted potential, and the music used throughout much of the movie did nothing but give bleak undertones and overtones to the point the final fight was boring because A: the music made it look like an impossible fight to win so as to give up, and B: neither of the three Superheroes are anybody I can truly relate to in contrast to their older incarnations from animated films or TV series.

How bad do I think it is overall? DIDYOUEVENCARETOTRY?!?!/10

Got it. Ya, because of how minimal comments/replies I get on some of my works more so than others I have made which are long since outdated in comparison, I don't have very much high faith in my current artwork because unlike my much older stuff, my newer stuff is generally ignored much of the time.