He hasn't attacked you. He wrote down some information on a children's movie and you call him rude for it because you see him as presenting his opinion as fact.
If you really want us to go in-depth on a fictional movie's probable character motives, you should present things differently, for example:
Your post:
They ended up bringing bad luck to the Great Valley as they were the ones who broke Saurus Rock,
THAT. WAS, NEVER. CONFIRMED!!!!!!!!!!!
That was NEVER confirmed! Why are you stating that like it's fact?? We don't know that!
Me, personally? I don't believe it EVER caused bad luck (I mean, it's not like there aren't other films where something bad happens n in the great valley!), but do I act like I know that for 100% sure? No! So why are you? Are you trying to deliberatelty mislead people??????
This isn't just a case of having a different opinion. You're deliberately stating your opinion like it's factual.
^ Of course it wasn't confirmed. It is what the kids believed. It is what was implied, very heavily, in the movie. They sang a song about it. The kids were scared about it. No one is going to spell it out for the viewers, but it was heavily implied. But yes, it wasn't confirmed.
Now if you wanted to start a discussion like a non-rude human being, you'd have posted something like this:
They ended up bringing bad luck to the Great Valley as they were the ones who broke Saurus Rock,
"I think that is a common opinion, but I actually believe they didn't bring bad luck to the Great Valley. It was after all, never confirmed by the writers, so it could be that they brought bad luck, or it could be that they didn't bring bad luck."
Honestly we are not "siding" with anyone. You are just being extremely obnoxious and then immediately apologize afterwards, as if that makes things right.
Now I understand that you are probably on the spectrum, and that is okay, many of us are. But that does not give you the right to act like a tyrant. Stop attacking other members, stop calling them rude for simply posting their thoughts. People have been reporting your posts left and right, people have called you out multiple times in public too.
Perhaps you feel like the entire forum is against you... But you have to ask, if the entire place is against you, is the place the problem, or are you?
I hope you have some time for an introspection. I expect no further comments on members being rude for talking about probably events in the movies or tv series. You're welcome to start a discussion, but please re-read your post two times before you post, and if you feel like you need to apologize for anything in the post, I would recommend leaving it out or rewriting that section. Because you are the one being rude, and we are done with it.
Thank you for trying to understand my point of view. I am indeed on the spectrum, and constantly struggle in real life because of it. But I know it's no excuse to treat others badly.
I think if Diddy had responded to me and explained his side, I would have been able to reconcile his comments that I...didn't care for. Since he never did, I let my frustration get the better of me, and I see now that nothing good was ever going to come of that.
I guess I just felt frustrasted because I felt that no one was hearing me on certain things. That's why I really appreciated your idea on what I could have worded better about the LBT 6 thing, Mumbling. I partially used it to make a thread just now, one I hope is respectful enough. Do you have any suggestions on how I could rephrase the next few comments I made?
Ichy is definitely an evil character,... He did display somewhat psychopathic tendencies, as he, too, was willing to kill the Gang in cold blood
That first part I STILL feel is him trying to present his opinion as fact. Since Ichy is a carnivore, I never really saw him as acting outside of his natural instinct. I don't mind it if Diddy thinks otherwise, but him saying Ichy is definitely an evil character---as if there isn't any other way of seeing the character---is what bothered me.
I hope that explains things a little better.