The Gang of Five
The forum will have some maintenance done in the next couple of months. We have also made a decision concerning AI art in the art section.


Please see this post for more details.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Pangaea

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 191
121
Ask Me / Ask Pangaea
« on: March 05, 2013, 06:45:07 PM »
Quote from: StrutEggStealer,Mar 5 2013 on  10:46 AM
Aw, thanks. I'm glad I could be of help. As mentioned above, I go all out on the story process. I really, really want to see stuff like that work out, and I try try try to see it fulfilled. I'm glad I didn't come off as overbearing, too XDD
... unless I did... O_o
Of course you didn't! I'm actually glad that you told me that you hoped I would finish the story; otherwise I wouldn't have felt obliged to tell you: "Sorry, but that's never gonna happen; the story I started is way too old now for me to just continue working on it," then: "Well, I guess I could conceivably continue working on it if I remade the whole thing, but it was such a silly idea that that's unlikely to happen. Here, let me tell you more about why it was so bad…", and finally: "Wait a minute, this could be a viable story after all; something I might actually be able to get published!"

Quote
Lol like I said, it was coming off too much like Dinotopia ;) but I wonder how it would have turned out using dinosaurs...
Personally, I think the world of fiction could use a lot more stories about humans and dinosaurs that aren't just all about them killing one another. :p

122
Ask Me / Initiate Question-Firing
« on: March 05, 2013, 03:20:14 AM »
Quote from: StrutEggStealer,Mar 4 2013 on  10:02 PM
^^ ohnuuuu, not another Tarbosaurus!! :lol
In light of a certain recent discovery, that comic might be even funnier (or at least more ironic) with a Deinocheirus substituted for the Therizinosaurus. :p Granted, Therizinosaurus's claws were much larger, and it is better known for them, so perhaps it suits the punchline better. Not that it matters; as it is it's one of my favorite comics featuring dinosaurs I've ever seen. :lol

Quote
Quote
the awful 2009 "documentary" Clash of the Dinosaurs pronounced Parasaurolophus's name as "Parasaur-rofl-us". How ironic.)
Ugh, they seriously did that? Nononono... wrong, wrong, wrong, altho the rofl pun made up for it :DD
If you think that's bad, that’s far from the worst of it. They also portrayed it as being able to defend itself using weaponized infrasound (basically, producing low-frequency sound that caused physical damage to its predators, even knocking them down); kind of a cool idea, but extremely unlikely and with absolutely no evidence for it (and that’s just one of many implausible, inaccurate, and overly theatrical depictions of dinosaur behavior and biology in the show).

Worst of all, Clash of the Dinosaurs infamously quote-mined a sauropod expert, Matt Wedel, who was one of the paleontologists they consulted when making the film. They asked him to talk about the sacro-lumbar expansion, a swelling in the hip vertebrae of sauropods that was once thought to house a sort of secondary brain (this was back when people believed that dinosaur brains were too pathetically tiny to control their whole bodies). What Wedel said in the interview was something along the lines of: “Sauropods had a swelling in the spinal cord near the pelvis. At one time it was thought that this functioned as a second brain to control the hind legs and tail, but this was incorrect.” But by the time Clash of the Dinosaurs aired on the Discovery Channel, when Wedel appeared onscreen as one of the talking heads, the filmmakers had cut the segment like this: “Sauropods had a swelling in the spinal cord near the pelvis.
[size0]At one time it was thought that this functioned as a second brain to control the hind legs and tail
[size0], but this was incorrect.”

:bang :bang :bang :slap :slap :slap :anger :anger :anger :anger

So basically, these people not only presented a long-discredited and completely inaccurate theory as scientific fact, when the expert they hired to talk about it on camera told them it wasn’t so, but they made that scientist look like he endorsed it. That goes beyond inaccuracy; it’s outright unethical. (Oh, and did I mention that they also misspelled his name and ignored pretty much all the information he gave them for their CGI sequences of sauropods? :rolleyes)

After complaints from a rightfully furious Wedel, Discovery had the clip removed for subsequent airings of the show and the DVD release, but Clash of the Dinosaurs’ reputation will forever be synonymous with one of the greatest dinosaur “documentary” scandals ever committed.

Sources:
http://svpow.com/2009/12/15/lies-damned-li...-the-dinosaurs/
http://svpow.com/2009/12/17/clash-of-the-d...honest-editing/

123
The Fridge / How you fell in love with dinosaurs
« on: March 04, 2013, 10:17:13 PM »
Gosh, I have no idea when or how I became interested in dinosaurs. It was a long time ago, I know that much. My mom theorizes that she got me a book on dinosaurs when I was very young which sparked my obsession, but if that is indeed the case, we’ve long forgotten what book it was. I think I was into dinosaurs before I watched The Land Before Time, but that movie definitely had an immeasurable influence on my love of them. My favorite species back then were Tyrannosaurus, Struthiomimus, and Pteranodon (not a dinosaur, as I knew even then, but always associated with them). Naturally, Petrie and Sharptooth were my favorite characters in LBT, and you can bet that I was ecstatic years later when I discovered LBT II with its lovable egg stealers. :p

The first dinosaur documentary I ever remember seeing was a 1992 PBS series called "The Dinosaurs!" (the second episode of which can be found here on Youtube), which contained several animated sequences of various Mesozoic creatures, which remain some of my favorite ever documentary depictions of prehistoric life. (This one, by far one of the most memorable to me, featuresóin order of appearanceóa pair of Herrerasaurus, a small cynodont, a rhynchosaur, and a Saurosuchus. Another clip, which I can't find online at the moment, showed) Sadly I broke the tape on which the series was recorded, after which my parents bought me another documentary on VHS, 1985's "Dinosaur!", which I didn't enjoy as much as its predecessor, but nonetheless satisfied my dinosaur documentary needs for the next few years. It contained stop-motion sequences of Brontosaurus/Apatosaurus browsing on trees, a Monoclonius (now Centrosaurus) being stalked and attacked by a Tyrannosaurus, and a family of Hadrosaurus whose nest is raided by a Struthiomimus, which eats several eggs before being chased off by the parents (who, in possibly the most unintentionally[?] hilarious moment in the whole show, mournfully inspect their now mostly destroyed nest, realize that there's one egg that can't be accounted for, andóI swearóturn and "yell" furiously at the retreating Struthiomimus as it struts off with the missing egg, presumably cackling villainously under its breath). Afterwards the poor Struthiomimus is ambushed and killed by a pair of Deinonychus (which are not only anachronistic to the time period, but get their name pronounced "DINE-o-NICK-us" by the narrator :huh:). Ironically, we lost the video a few years later, and afterwards rediscovered “The Dinosaurs!” at a college library, which promptly returned to being the most regularly watched dinosaur documentary in our household.

Surprisingly enough, I didn't watch Jurassic Park until several years later, though at some point my dad recorded a documentary on the making of the movie, which became yet another of our family’s frequently re-watched videos. The program featured most of Jurassic Park’s major dinosaur sequences, and as a result, the movie itself made less of an impression on me when I finally watched it than it probably would have otherwise, though it nonetheless became one of my obsessions. I was fully aware of most of the well-known errors in the movie even before I saw it, but I loved it so much that I depicted JP-style dinosaursóparticularly my favorite: the frill-necked venom-spitting mini-Dilophosaurusóin many of the drawings and stories I made for the next few years (not that I ever claimed these to be scientifically accurate).

A new chapter in my dinosaur obsession opened in 2000 or 2001 (I can’t remember which), when I received the DVD and companion book of Walking With Dinosaurs for my birthday. Unsurprisingly, I loved it, and it became my new favorite dinosaur show, though ironically the episodes that made the greatest impression on me were the ones that focused on non-dinosaurs: “Cruel Sea” (marine reptiles, especially Liopleurodon) and “Giant of the Skies” (pterosaurs, mainly Ornithocheirus). For a time, I considered WWD to be my premier dinosaur resource: the most accurate and up-to-date documentary around. That turned out to be a huge mistake. :oops It makes me feel even stupider that I was aware that much of the behavior of the creatures in the show was conjectural, but assumed the physical appearance and size statistics of many of them to be scientifically accurate. It was only later that I found out that the sizes of many of the creatures, particularly Liopleurodon and Ornithocheirus, were grossly exaggerated; the result of dubious estimates of fragmentary fossil remains that often had not yet been scientifically described. (Annoyingly, I’m still finding books that state Liopleurodon is stated to have been 80 feet long. I’m not too surprised that I was fooled, but the authors of these books, some of whom are scientists themselves? :bang). Over time, as I continued to watch dinosaur documentaries, I realized that many of them were doing the same thing as Walking With Dinosaurs (sometimes worse): portraying outdated, poorly researched, or downright inaccurate data (and sometimes pure speculation) as fact, and overdramatizing their creatures at the expense of scientific accuracy and often plain realism. As a result, my interest in dinosaur documentaries began to wane, and sadly I don’t watch them much anymore. :neutral (There are a few shows, such as Dinosaur Revolution, that I’ve heard good things about and am curious to see, but so far I haven’t gotten around to it.) On that note, I find it a little disturbing that few, if any, of the dinosaur documentaries of the past decade have had all their facts straight (and these aren’t facts that have been overturned by the onward march of paleontology since the documentaries were produced; I’m talking things that science already knows about that’s still being portrayed incorrectly).

Okay…this was more of a history of my love of dinosaurs (mainly my experiences with dinosaur films) than a story of how I first became interested in them. :oops I guess I’ll stop here.

124
Ask Me / Ask a Question of Me
« on: March 04, 2013, 06:06:47 PM »
Sorry to hear that. :(

Well, feel free to contact me if you'd like help coming up with ideas.

125
Ask Me / Ask Pangaea
« on: March 04, 2013, 06:04:40 PM »
Quote from: StrutEggStealer,Feb 21 2013 on  10:03 AM
Now that sounds like something I'd want to read! You got me hooked after Struthiomimus :lol I like the elements, and hope you get around to finishing it!
Er…well…sorry to disappoint you, but there's basically no chance of me "finishing" that story. :oops Like I said, it's at least 13 years old, horribly outdated and inaccurate, and far below my current standards of quality.

Incidentally, a few weeks ago, while cleaning the basement, I found two of the original books (read: small stacks of paper stapled together) I had made depicting the story. The story was called "Tear and Struth" (the former pronounced like "pterosaur", not like the water that comes from your eyes :p; the latter pronounced with a long "oo" sound, like "Ruth" ;)), which should give you an idea of my level of creativity for naming my characters. :rolleyes Each page consisted of a pencil drawing with accompanying text (though I had never gotten around to writing the narrative for the later pages), all rather crappy (Granted, I was a preteen when I made it). The storyline consisted of what I previously described, which followed up with the titular duo meeting a friendly Triceratops (with perfectly straight horns, including a nose horn the same length as the other two :huh:) who carried them on its head to the edge of the sea and tossed them into a hollow log, presumably so that they could ride back to the Pteranodon colony. Along the way they were threatened by an Elasmosaurus, which was scared off by a giant pliosaur, which apparently proceeded to capsize their log as it dove underwater, forcing the pair to hitch a whale shark-style ride on a large ichthyosaur (which technically shouldn't have existed in their time period), culminating in them being unceremoniously flung onto the beach much like the gang in LBT V at the end of the shark chase (I can't remember whether I had seen that movie by the time I wrote the story). That's where it cut off; like most of the projects I have ever embarked on, I never finished the story.

Admittedly, I do still like the concept of "Tear and Struth", and it's something I could potentially revisit someday. Finishing the original story is out of the question, but I suppose I could remake it, changing the characters' names and thoroughly reworking the whole thing to make it up to date with what I (and the current paleontological community) now know about dinosaurs. …Actually, the more I think about it, the more the idea of returning to this concept appeals to me. Maybe I could even get it published as some kind of book series (probably for children or young adults), perhaps even with an appendix to each book containing educational content about the prehistoric animals featured in the story. :idea

You know, it amazes me how sometimes I can start out writing a post thinking one thing, and by the time I get to the end I've come up with an entirely new idea or completely changed my opinion. It's one of my favorite things about talking to people on this forum. Thanks so much for the inspiration, StrutEggStealer. :D (If I do write these stories, I'll be sure to name you under "Acknowledgements", maybe even give you a little shout-out of some kind in the story itself. ;))

Quote
I tried a sort of Dinotopia approach in one of my stories - humans and dinosaurs living together not-so-peacefully. My main charry was a Dilopho and a cop. One of his friends was a Troodon photographer/geek/blogger, and his love interest was a female Dryosaurus lieutenant. I recently scrapped the idea of dinosaurs and humans and just made it humans, so I definitely see where you're coming from :DD
:goodluck!!
WHAAAT?! You got rid of the dinosaurs in favor of a human-only story? That's madness! :wow

Just kidding; I'm sure you had your reasons, even if I can't comprehend them. :p Personally, I just can't write humans. Every human I think I've ever depicted in anything I've written was either an insert of myself or my siblings, or more two-dimensional and characterization-free than the paper they were on. I still have trouble grasping how normal people think and function in real life; creating original human characters that aren't just splinters of my own personality is all but impossible for me. :oops

126
The Party Room / Tell us something about yourself!
« on: March 04, 2013, 04:18:50 PM »
I used to be obsessed with theropods to the exclusion of almost all other dinosaurs, but over time I've developed a fascination with most of the dinosaur family tree, even the ones I once considered "boring", such as sauropods and basal ornithopods. All the new data on dinosaurs that has come about in the last several years and the resulting changing portrayals in paleoart have definitely helped.

On an utterly random note, the word "walrus" has been inextricably stuck in my head lately. :P:

127
Ask Me / Initiate Question-Firing
« on: March 04, 2013, 04:10:55 PM »
Quote from: StrutEggStealer,Feb 20 2013 on  07:30 PM
Wow, that is awesome!! Kinda makes up for that, maybe even for the confusion of Zippo's species (that still irks me, even though Zippo Stenosaurus is my absolute favorite saurian in the films :)) Because as I recall - I actually searched this one^^ - Stenosaurus is a slender, crocodilian-like creature, whereas Stenonychosaurus, which may have been more of what they were aiming toward, was a relative of the brainy Troodon.
The croc's name is actually Steneosaurus (a lot of sites just get the spelling wrong :rolleyes), though I wouldn't be surprised if the name "Stenosaurus" is floating around somewhere out there in the sea of biological nomenclature (most likely in the abyss of invalid names) some critter or other did get the nam "Stenosaurus"). You're right, though: Zippo was based on Stenonychosaurus inequalis, which is currently considered to be synonymous with Troodon (more or less the same story as Brontosaurus and Apatosaurus). However, from what I've heard, Stenonychosaurus may be split from Troodon and become its own genus again sometime in the near future. In any case, my best guess is that the miniseries just screwed up the pronunciation. (This sort of thing, unfortunately, happens more often than you might think: the awful 2009 "documentary" Clash of the Dinosaurs pronounced Parasaurolophus's name as "Parasaur-rofl-us". :slap How ironic.)

Quote
Also, that comic was terrible... terribly funny :DD
Pfft…If you liked that comic, here's
here's another one (albeit not Deinocheirus-related) that cracks me up every time I look at it. :lol

128
The Party Room / Tell us something about yourself!
« on: March 04, 2013, 03:31:04 PM »
Quote from: Petrie85,Feb 15 2013 on  05:20 AM
Let's see I don't get offended by racist comments jokes and words. I think racism is funny actually. No I'm not a racist at all.
I'm the complete opposite. I can't stand racism, and racist jokes and portrayals of racial stereotypes make me extremely uncomfortable.

At the same time, human diversity (both physical and cultural) is quite interesting to me, though it can't hold a candle to my fascination for non-human species.

Quote from: Cancerian Tiger,Mar 4 2013 on  01:13 AM
I was on the first floor of my housing unit starting my laundry.  After I started the washer and began to head for the stairs, down comes a fridge bigger than me with some glass in it, followed by my neighbor who is probably one of the biggest alcoholics I've ever known.  He was drunk off his arse and launched a fridge down the stairs, supposedly getting rid of it.  I'm just glad nobody got hit :crazy.
Yikes! :blink: Glad you're okay. I hope you or somebody else called someone to deal with that wacko (professional help, perhaps?).

129
The Fridge / Giant hornets vs Killer Bees
« on: March 03, 2013, 07:20:03 PM »
Quote from: Petrie85,Mar 3 2013 on  09:11 AM
They kill the most people in the world ever. One sting and you're pretty much a goner.
Quote from: Petrie85,Mar 3 2013 on  10:28 AM
What I read was it doesn't matter if you're allergic or not one sting from a Giant Asian Hornet can kill you.
That's a myth. Check the second source I cited. One sting (even three stings) is only likely to be fatal if you're allergic, or possibly if you leave it untreated, have preexisting health problems of some kind, etc.

In fact, I don't think there are really any venomous animals out there in which 1 sting/bite = certain death, especially if you can get proper first aid. Venomous snakes don't always inject a fatal quantity of venom (sometimes they don't inject venom at all); deadly spiders don't always manage to penetrate human skin with their fangs; even the Australian box jellyfish, one of the most venomous animals on Earth, doesn't usually kill a healthy adult unless at least eight feet of tentacle has contacted their skin. As far as I know, there's no animal on Earth whose venom has specifically evolved to kill humans. Some venomous creatures are certainly more dangerous than others, but the giant hornet probably isn't high on the list. Most sources I've seen say that they kill about 40 people a year, but if you think about it, that's not all that much. According to one book I own on dangerous animals, ants, bees, and wasps kill about 50 people per year in the United States (a dozen of those are honeybee stings), one particular species of box jelly (Chiropsalmus quadrigatus) kills 20–50 people a year, and elapid snakes (mostly kraits and cobras) kill tens of thousands. (Mind you, most of these snake deaths occur in countries where human populations are massive, and antivenom is hard to come by.) elephants in India kill 150 people per year. And there are nonvenomous animals that are more dangerous than giant hornets as well. In the U.S., an estimated 100 people are killed each year in car collisions with white-tailed deer (more deaths than are caused by any of the country's venomous or predatory animals); in India, elephants kill 150 people per year; worldwide, saltwater crocodiles have been estimated to kill as many as a thousand people a year. And don't even get me started on deaths from mosquito bites as a result of malaria and other diseases…

Quote from: FlipperBoidSkua,Mar 3 2013 on  10:30 AM
Plus, a pet peeve of mine is when people automatically think one species (in this case, killer bees) would win a fight simply because it's more infamous among us humans. <_<
Same here (*cough* T. rex vs. Spinosaurus). For that matteróno offense to anyoneó"X animal vs. Y animal" scenarios in general are rather ridiculous to me. :rolleyes And the way I see it, in this particular case, it's kind of an uneven fight no matter what the circumstances, since one of the combatants can only win if it grossly outnumbers the other and/or has an extreme stroke of luck. (And for all I know, giant hornets may be resistant or immune to bee venom.)

Source:
The Book of Deadly Animals by Gordon Grice

130
The Fridge / Giant hornets vs Killer Bees
« on: March 03, 2013, 09:48:54 AM »
By "giant hornet", you mean the Asian giant hornet (Vespa mandarinia), right?

For those of you not familiar with it, this is the world's largest hornet, measuring over an inch and a half long with a wingspan of 2–3 inches. The Japanese subspecies (V. m. japonica) is probably the most popularly known. While its venom is not the most potent of any insect, it is agonizingly painful and can literally dissolve flesh. :blink: (It's worth mentioning, however, that the chemical responsible for this oft-cited quality of giant hornet venom is actually common to bee and wasp venoms, even that of the honeybee. It's the sheer amount of venom the hornet injects, and a failure to get treatment for it, that causes notable necrosis.) The good news is that as long as you're not allergic, the giant hornet's sting is usually not fatal, and like most stinging insects, it is unlikely to attack you in the first place as long as it is left alone.

What these hornets are really deadly to is other insects, including introduced European honeybees, which are not adapted to defend themselves against these hornets. It would seem that their stingers have trouble penetrating the hornets' thick exoskeletons. Apparently just one of these hornets can kill 30 to 40 honeybees a minute, decapitating them or stinging them to death. A hunting party of less than three dozen can completely wipe out a hive of 30,000 honeybees in a matter of hours (For an impressiveóif somewhat melodramaticóvideo, look here). The native Japanese honeybees, however, have a novel method of defending themselves against these marauders: when a scout discovers their hive, the bees swarm around it, vibrating their muscles to generate enough heat to literally cook the hornet to death, so that it never reveals the location of their hive to other hornets (video here).

Africanized honeybees, or "killer bees" are a hybrid of European and African honeybee subspecies (Apis mellifera). Their stings are no more deadly than those of normal honeybees, but they live in far larger swarms and are much more aggressive: quicker to attack and slower to give up a chase. These behavioral traits that make them more dangerous to humans, but unless their attacking swarms can create enough heat to kill a Japanese giant hornet, or are more likely to find chinks in the hornet's armor, I don't see how an attacking swarm of these hornets would have any more trouble with them than they would with European honeybees. (That's assuming you're talking about a swarm-to-swarm battle. A one-on-one between a killer bee and a giant hornet would be laughably one-sided, like pitting a red-bellied piranha against a bull shark.)

Sources:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/20...antHornets.html
http://everything2.com/title/Asian+giant+hornet
http://www.wild-facts.com/2011/wild-fact-6...n-giant-hornet/

131
Ask Me / Questions to Malte
« on: March 03, 2013, 02:20:22 AM »
Just a random question relating to something you mentioned in Littlefoot1616's star day thread:

Did you ever find out when, where, and by whom the trampoline was invented? :lol (Seriously, I'm rather curious myself.)

132
The Welcome Center / What is up guys
« on: March 03, 2013, 02:13:23 AM »
Welcome to The Gang Of Five, Dinosaurman! :DD

Hilarious choice of avatar (That's one of the funniest egg stealer screenshots, in my opinion :lol); hope you manage to get it to fit right. I'd suggest cropping out the black spaces on the sides in addition to resizing it, then uploading it to Photobucket.

Are you an Ozzy/Strut fan?

133
Ask Me / Ask Pangaea
« on: February 20, 2013, 12:04:26 AM »
Quote from: StrutEggStealer,Feb 19 2013 on  10:27 AM
Dunno if this has been asked, but with all your knowledge of dinosaurs, have you considered writing a book about dinosaurs?
The thought has probably crossed my mind a few times, though, like most large goals that people have asked me about, I doubt that I could do it very well. I'm not sure what sort of qualifications one needs to have in order to write a dinosaur book (I have an English major and a Biology minor, but no paleontology degree), but even if I do have them, I'm such a dismally slow and inconsistent writer (in that I often procrastinate and often can't muster the willpower, concentration, or passion to write) that it would probably take me ages to do. I also imagine that I would have to contact some real paleontology experts, to learn what it entails to write a proper educational book on dinosaurs. (No, I don't consider myself an expert; personally, I think I'm kind of like a sentient Wikipedia, with banks of data that I'm constantly updating from various external sources, attempting to weed out the info that is outdated or inaccurate. The trouble is that the floors of my memory banks are comprised of sieves, and so I have to constantly brush up on my knowledge to compensate for the fact that I'm constantly forgetting things…) I guess it's something I could feasibly do, but it would take me ages and would be very difficult, and I don't think the final product would stand up to a lot of the books written by real experts. (Obviously my self-esteem wouldn't help push me toward completing such a goal…)

Quote
Have you tried LBT fanfiction, or dinosaur fanfics of any kind?
Well, I've sort of dabbled in writing fragments of a few LBT fanfic ideas I've come up with. I've certainly thought of plenty of concepts for LBT stories, but as with all my ideas, fleshing them out and getting them down on paper (or a computer screen) is much more challenging.

Over the years, I've also come up with several ideas for original stories involving dinosaurs and other animals. Back in the late 90s I had a story set in the late Cretaceous involving a baby Pteranodon that fell from his cliff nest (Pteranodon almost certainly did not nest on cliffs, but that's what I had seen in the books and movies back then) and, after being spooked by a Stygimoloch popping its head out of the bushed, ran into and befriended a Struthiomimus, who helped him find his way back to his home, and afterwards proceeded to have regular adventures with him.

For well over a decade, however, the stories I have focused on the most have been set in a world inhabited by prehistoric and modern animals from throughout Earth’s history. The setting and characters have gone through so many revamps and reimaginings that the current version only faintly resembles the original, and none of the literally dozens of stories I previously completed could be considered canon anymore. Originally the stories took place on an undiscovered island with a vast, Great Valley-esque ring of mountains encircling its interior; modern-day animals lived outside it; prehistoric species inside. The stories were extremely random and cartoonish, with uncountable numbers of extremely simple characters, most of them sharing only a tiny range of personality types. They traveled around in vehicles called “cat-cars” (modeled directly on Sylvester the cat slippers, like these), lived in a giant white building built by a sea lion as a hotel/apartment complex for prehistoric and modern creatures alike, and all of their resources from food to electricity could be spontaneously generated by magician’s hats.

The current incarnation of these stories is (thankfully) much more thought-out and far less ridiculous. The setting is an entire planet rather than an island, I am attempting to limit the number of characters as much as I can, and the animals have no outlandish technology (though one extremely technologically advanced species does feature prominently). The frustrating thing is that I want the world to seem as real as possible, but there are still some fantastical elements that I can’t figure out how to get around. I’m also concerned that there are too many different themes in the stories that readers will have difficulty accepting as compatible. And I’m struggling to figure out how to make the stories relatable to readers, since the world has no humans in it, but I don’t want the significance of encountering living dinosaurs to be lost on the characters. On top of that I want the stories to be as original, interesting, and clichÈ-free as possible. As a result of all these challenges (plus many others), I haven’t been making much progress on these stories, either.

134
Ask Me / Initiate Question-Firing
« on: February 19, 2013, 10:34:36 PM »
Quote from: StrutEggStealer,Feb 11 2013 on  05:46 PM
I feel so deflated about liopluerodon - that it's been shruken down. I have the WWD book, and all that footage of a massive Lio stalking those opthalmosauruses or those cryptocliduses... and now all for naught :( but i suppose that's still an impressive length.
Sorry to disappoint you like that. :( :oops If it's any consolation, though, paleontologists have no way of knowing the maximum size of pliosaurs and many other prehistoric animals, or if there were any species out there that were bigger than the ones we know about. Maybe pliosaurs didn’t get any bigger than 40 feet, but maybe some did; we may never know. But even if they weren’t as massive as we thought in terms of body length, the fact remains that there are pliosaur skull and jaw fossils out there that suggest that at least some of these creatures had heads measuring 8–10 feet in length (nearly twice as long as the skull of any known T. rex); that’s pretty darn formidable. It's estimated that a pliosaur's skull accounted for about 17–20% of its total body length, though that assumes that giant pliosaurs had the same head-to-body ratio as smaller ones. And like you said, even a ~30 foot Liopleurodon would have been a monster, certainly the top predator of its environment.

Quote
Dinotopia reference - the mosasaurs represented in that film were basically massive, bulky crocs.
Yeah, it always bothered me that the Dinotopia miniseries portrayed mosasaurs so inaccurately. :rolleyes Ironically, though, paleontologists recently discovered a new species of mosasaur called Pannoniasaurus that lived in freshwater, measured 13–20 feet long as an adult, and may have had webbed feet or limblike flippers. It didn't look much like the deep-skulled, armor-plated brutes from Dinotopia, but it's nonetheless a striking coincidence. :blink:

Quote
And it was really more whale-like than anything.
Well, maybe somewhere between a toothed whale like an orca and a giant, seagoing Komodo dragon (though they looked a little like unarmored, flippered crocodiles). Mosasaurs were recently found to have tail flukes like whales (though vertically oriented like the tails of fish and ichthyosaurs), and they did give birth to live young. Many also had expandable jaws with extra rows of teeth on the roof of the mouth, like snakes, which would have allowed them to manipulate and swallow prey wider than their heads (A few later varieties, like Mosasaurus, developed jaws that were less flexible, but presumably gave them immensely powerful bites). It's also likely that they had forked tongues for detecting scents. They're extremely interesting creatures.

By the way, I found this on DeviantArt a few days ago. Maybe it's not that funny, but I couldn't help but chuckle at it, given how it reminded me of one of our recent discussions. :lol

Sources:
http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/20...nster-mandible/
http://carnivoraforum.com?topic=9748338/1/
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/20...pecies_20121220
http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/20...-goronyosaurus/
http://www.oceansofkansas.com/Greatrep.html
http://www.oceansofkansas.com/RapidMosa.html

135
Starday Wishes / Happy Birthday Littlefoot1616
« on: February 17, 2013, 04:51:50 PM »
Derp, I didn't get around to posting in this thread yesterday. :wacko Sorry about that. :oops

Happy 28th star day, Jason! :birthday

By the way, Iris, that Littlefoot clay sculpture is awesome! :DD (I didn't recognize that he was on a trampoline at first; that's hilarious. :lol)

136
The Fridge / I'm engaged!
« on: February 16, 2013, 06:36:53 PM »
That's awesome, LB&T! :wow Congratulations! :D

I could be wrong, but this is the first time I can remember anyone announcing an engagement on the GOF. It feels very special. :smile

137
LBT Fanfiction / Quest for the Mask of Life
« on: February 16, 2013, 02:35:12 PM »
Quote from: The Chronicler,Feb 2 2013 on  09:45 PM
Once thing I can say right here is that the mask's curse is not permanent (except for the first guy to have been cursed by that mask, but that's a different story). When Nocturn threw away the Mask of Life, the curse it had on him wore off after a few seconds, because he was no longer touching it.
Oh. Duh, :slap I forgot about that. It appears that my crappy memory is causing me to lose the plot. :oops

I guess my next question is, how directly do you have to be touching the Mask of Life in order for its curse to affect you? For instance, if you picked the mask up with a pair of tongs, would you be safe from the curse? :p

Quote
An odd-looking pink creature had been foolish enough to try to take the mask, and he was more than happy to follow through with Pridak's orders: “consider them a free meal.”
I’m pretty sure the first letter should be capitalized, though it may be a stylistic choice.

Quote
Ruby's eyes widened as a sudden realization occurred to her. “Of course! It all makes sense now! I'm holding the Mask of Life!”

“Yes, I can see that,” said Cera, as if it was the most obvious thing in the world.
While not quite a laugh-out-loud moment, I found Cera’s context-oblivious response here amusing, and totally in-character for her. :lol

Quote
He then stepped back and began shattering the coral with the blades of his lower arms.
Hey, you, that stuff takes hundreds of years to grow! Stop damaging the reef ecosystem! :p

Nice save by Hahli, too (both the venom immunity trick and playing possum afterwards). I didn’t see that coming.

Quote
These eels would occasionally rush out to snatch any fish that were unfortunate * to pass by. The was no way of knowing just how long these eels were, but seeing as some of them reached more than halfway across the trench, it was safe to assume they were quite long indeed.
*Did you mean to include the word “enough” here?
Also, “The” should be “There”.
And while not technically an error, I think you should include the detail that the eels have no eyes. (If they’re like a lot of poorly sighted deep-sea fish, they probably have no pigment either, and would appear ghostly white, if you wanted to use that as well.) It helps to visualize them better.

Quote
“Then that's too bad for them,” said Hewkii, “because I sure don't intend on staying here. All we need is * plan...”
*Insert “a”.

Quote
Nuparu jumped awake and took a quick glance at his surroundings. Rubbing the back of his head, he irritably said, “What did you hit me for? You know we can get out of here whenever we like.”

“Good. Then tell them,” replied Hewkii, gesturing over his shoulder.
Please forgive my cluelessness, but until I checked the quoted text, I couldn’t tell for certain that Hewkii was gesturing at the eels. I think you should specify that. (Also, maybe you should clarify that he’s gesturing above him, since “over his shoulder” sounds like he’s just pointing behind him at Chomper and Spike.)

Quote
He then kicked Spike in frustration, but that only resulted in a hurt foot.
:lol

Quote
Chomper never really admitted it to anyone ó not even Ruby ó but he always found destruction to be quite fascinating, especially the explosive kind.
Heh. Looks like Chomper would be a MythBusters fan. :p

Quote
The sudden changed cause the eel to loosen its hold on the Toa of Stone and, once Nuparu let go, float up above the group.
Should be “change caused”.

Nice work on the description of the sharks vs. zombified sea creatures battle, especially Littlefoot’s point of view of it. And great choice of line for closing the chapter. :yes

138
The Fridge / Got My New Pets!!
« on: February 14, 2013, 03:16:25 PM »
Thanks for the update, Sparky! :smile Great to hear that the training’s going so well. It was really interesting, too: I’d never heard of bruxing before! And I knew rats were smart, but I had no idea they could be trained to do so many different tricks! :! Not to mention the adorable mental imagery of the rats’ interactions with you! :DD

Quote from: FlipperBoidSkua,Feb 11 2013 on  10:57 PM
Well, the thing is, rats haven't been domesticated long enough for true breeds to emerge. Right now, we call the differences between them "variety", so they can all occur in the same litter.
Hmm…I guess that doesn’t really surprise me. Makes me wonder, though, if people really could selectively breed rats to produce distinct types. (Somehow, the image of a giant domestic rat breed was the first idea that came to mind. :lol) It probably wouldn’t take too long, either, compared to the time it took for separate breeds to emerge in other domestic animals, considering the rate at which rats produce new generations.

Quote
Luckily, I got first dibs cause I waited outside in the cold and rain HOURS before the store even opened! THAT'S dedication!! :lol
Well…never let it be said that you’re not a devoted rat lover. :o

Quote
Quote
I'm pretty sure that all three of my siblings have told me at some point that they would love to have rats as pets (as would I). It’s probably not going to happen as long as Sasquatch (our cat) is around, though. Oh well.
Watch this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ikm3o5hDks

However, from what I heard, I think Sasquatch might be too hyper to be trusted around ratties! :lol
Yeah, I've seen quite a few photos and videos showing cats getting along with rats and other small animals (and they are adorable :wub), but sadly I don’t think Sasquatch is that kind of cat. Even if he did view a rat as a friend rather than prey, I'd be afraid of Sasquatch getting playful around said rat, because he plays awfully rough. He has a history of eviscerating his catnip toys; his beloved Grinch plushie has considerably shorter fur than it originally did due to Sasquatch tearing them out with his teeth; and he has become known as "the Destroyer of Feet" for his habit of ambushing us (usually while we're going up or down the stairs), simultaneously digging all 25 of his claws into our feet, and nomming away. :lol It's painful enough for us; I don't want to imagine what it would be like for a rat. *shudder*

Quote from: FlipperBoidSkua,Feb 11 2013 on  10:57 PM
Quote
Last-minute thought: Ooh! You should find some way to record Tanooki's Water Bottle Ritual. I'd love to see that!
I've been thinking the same thing! I bet it'll be a big hit on youtube!! Now if I can figure out a way to record it in a decent, non-shaky manner with my webcam without freaking Tanooki out...
Maybe you could set up your laptop close enough to the rat cage that the water bottle is in frame of the webcam, and start recording when Tanooki goes for a drink? I guess that might limit your ability to actually use your computer, though… Maybe if you set up your rattie surveillance system before or while Tanooki was out of the cage? I can only imagine that after 20+ minutes of playing and training with you, he’d be pretty thirsty, and go straight for the water bottle after being returned to his cage (This is just speculation on my part; obviously you’d know much better than I whether there’s any kind of predictability to Tanooki’s drinking habits).

Quote
The reason behind this is that a rat cannot sustain its fear for more than 20 minutes.
Really? Interesting. :! Do you know scientifically how that works? I suppose it makes sense for an animal to have a sort of "fear timer" like that, to keep it from continuing to hide from a threat so long after it has passed that it misses out on time it could spend foraging or performing other crucial activities, but I've never actually heard of or thought about such a mechanism before.

Hope Koopa and Tanooki’s good progress continues, and that you get to visit your other ratties (especially Domino) often!

139
Random Role Play / In the land before time
« on: February 12, 2013, 04:42:47 AM »
While Ozzy dunked his head in the river (looking amusingly similar to those depictions of ostriches with their heads buried in the sand; something ostriches don’t actually do), Pangaea turned his attention to Strut.

“Okay, Strut, it’s time for that blindfold to come off.”

“Already?” In sharp contrast to Ozzy, Strut actually sounded a little disappointed. “I kinda like having this thing on; I feel like it gives me some privacy, ya know?”

Forced to pause while his brain processed Strut’s words and failingly attempted to analyze the logic in them, Pangaea took a few seconds to respond. “Well, Ozzy’s taking his off, and given the relationship between you two, I think you’d be better off if you could see when you needed to duck, if you know what I mean.”

Strut quickly comprehended Pangaea’s reasoning, flinching as if in remembrance of some particularly painful bruises. “Oh. Okay.”

“Now, if you can just lie down and rest your head to the ground, I can get that thing off for you.”

Evidently more trusting of Pangaea than Ozzy (or maybe just more easily influenced), Strut complied. “This isn’t gonna hurt, is it?”

“Well, it’ll hurt less if you know how to do it right. Now, I’m gonna have you count backwards from five, and when you hit one, I’ll pull the blindfold off. I’m gonna need to put my foot on your beak to brace myself, if that’s okay.”

“Uhh…sure, I guess.”

Pangaea carefully placed one foot on top of Strut’s snout and grasped the top end of the leaf blindfold. “Okay, start counting.”

“Uh…five…four…”

Pangaea ripped the blindfold off in one swift yank.

“YEOW!” Strut’s yelp was muffled slightly due to his lower jaw being pinned to the ground by Pangaea’s foot, but it still made the sound-sensitive glider cringe. “What did you do that for?” Strut whined. “I didn’t count all the way!”

“Hurts less when you aren’t expecting it,” Pangaea explained with an apologetic shrug. “Sorry about that. How’s your head feel now?”

Strut rubbed the nape of his neck where the sap-covered end of the leaf had been stuck. “Hurts less now, actually,” he said with a hint of surprise.

“See? What did I tell you?” Pangaea glanced at Ozzy to check that he still had his head in the river, then held up the blindfold in front of Strut. “Here,” he whispered.

Strut looked perplexed. “What’s this for?”

“To eat!” Pangaea hissed. “You must be hungry, and Ozzy’s not looking. Quick, take it!”

“Oh!” Without delay, Strut grabbed the leaf in his beak and wolfed it down.

“Hmm, very good! Thanks, Pangaggy!”

“That’s ëPangaea’,” Pangaea corrected, sighing lightly but smiling amusedly.

140
Visual Art / FBS's General Art
« on: February 12, 2013, 03:03:48 AM »
Quote from: FlipperBoidSkua,Feb 11 2013 on  09:24 PM
Really, I'm sorry myself for constantly adding more pics and bombarding you with newer and newer stuff to add to your review!
Seriously, Flippy*, that's not something you have to apologize for. I'm just a slow reviewer and you're a fast artist (and I think most people would agree with my opinion that the latter quality is far more desirable and commendable than the former); don't limit yourself and your creativity just to make things convenient for me. :)

*That's your new nickname. :p …No, actually I like Sparky much better, but who says I can't have two nicknames for someone? (I mean, provided that said person doesn't find the nickname irritating. :unsure:)

Quote
Actually, I based his design on a show called Animal X, when they did an episode of the chupacabra. I actually watched the Choopie episode of JCA after I conceived the character. HOWEVER, drawing this new design, I DID use the JCA's chupacabra as a color reference!!
Oh. :oops Shows you what I know! :P: I'll admit I did think it looked slimmer than the JCA version, but I still thought I saw some physical similarities, and the colors definitely threw me off.

Quote
I LOVE drawing animals that are realistic, yet still show emotions and personality via their face.
Yipes…another freaky coincidence between you and me: :blink: I like to draw my animal characters the same way: realistic, but stylized just enough to be expressive.

Quote
I believe I done those hole-thingies because they were prominent in the CGI model in Animal X. Back then, I remember interpretating it as some adaptation that allows Chupa to better receive telephathic messages from others as well as receiving the brain-waves that allows him to read minds. In present times, I'm not too sure if that would work, but I too think they're rather odd. I'm now unsure what their function is...
I do vaguely recall seeing a few of those Animal X episodes, including the one on the Chupacabra, but I don't even remember what their CGI version looked like, so I can't offer much speculation. There's probably no way of knowing what sort of adaptations would be conducive to telepathy, since that ability does not exist in the natural world as far as I am aware. :p There are, however, fish that produce electrical fields (namely knifefish and elephantnoses), which can communicate with one another by pulsing those fields, which I've always thought of as almost being like communication on a telepathic channel (although it would probably be more accurate to compare it to communicating via radio signals). Some electrosensitive fish do have pits in their heads that help them detect electrical fields, so maybe Chupa's holes do serve an equivalent function for his telepathic sense.

Quote
I think I did intend Crypto to be a bit blander than the other two, as if to emphasize the difference between them. And I never actually watched the Three Stooges; I think the shared joke is AWESOME.
If you can ignore the occasional politically incorrect content that comes from being a older show, I highly recommend The Three Stooges for comedic entertainment, especially if you like slapstick and quirky insults. :lol

In the Stooges' case, the bathing cap joke I was thinking of was only referred to in dialogue, and went like this:
Quote
Curly (the Stooge with only stubble for hair): "I ain't gonna take no shower!"
Moe: "Why not?"
Curly: "I ain't got my bathin' cap!"
(I think there was also a scene in a much later film where the resident bald Stooge really was seen wearing a bathing cap in the shower.)

Quote
Yes! I'm not the only one to find the front view creepy! It's the eyes, I swear!! I once made a collage of different facial expressions for Azul and one of them (a look he makes when he's hungry) is genuinely unnerving: he stares intently at you with his mouth open enough to show his rows of sharp teeth whilst drooling excessively. And he won't stop staring until you give him food...
Hmm…how does the effectiveness of that technique compare with Chupa's Begging Face? :p

Quote
Yeah, the pictures I've seen of what these goblins supposively looks like doesn't really show nails or claws on the feet. But he does have toes, so yay!
It could be that the people who described the goblins didn't get a very good look at the feet (Let's face it: if you ran into one of those guys, you probably wouldn't be paying much attention to what their feet looked like :p), so the drawings based on the eyewitness reports are just lacking in foot detail.

Quote
And yeah, Azul has both conscious and unconscious control of his glowing. Many of his pranks (which takes place at night, seeing how he's naturally nocturnal) has him dimming his lights so he can't be seen and it's also something he did when Xeno first found him so as not to draw attention to himself (which failed regardless). I also ready that when shot at, the goblins flash brighter when they're hit, something I interprete as being an involuntary response.
Cool! :)

Quote
Awwwww!! Thank you!!! Especially since I find Dragonite adorable as it is! And I don't blame you if you like Dratini and Dragonair's design better, as Dragonite seems kinda...off compared to them. And apparently, he does for a reason. The reason he looks so different from his pre-evolutions and why he's such a pain-in-the-neck to beat is because he was originally intended to be a stand-alone Legendary Pokemon. Then Nintendo changed their minds and added him to the Dratini evolutionary line. I guess it doesn't really matter overall, but I found it interesting enough to share!
Wow, I'd never heard that. :o Interesting.

Quote
According to a lot of people who commented on the pic in DA, the types Psychics are weak against (Bugs, Dark, and Ghost) are actually based on common fears! I guess the logic is that people can't think straight when confronted with something they're afraid of.
Ohhh…that does make sense! I still like my "annoying fly" theory though. :p

Quote
Wow, I never noticed how his antennae look like cables!! That's AWESOME :! !!! He probably would be useful, if he doesn't blow it up (Sparky's voltage is so powerful, so far only a lighthouse proved strong enough to take it) or eat it (yes, Sparky eats batteries!) :lol
Oh. Maybe not such a good idea after all, then. It would be pretty funny, though. :lol

Alternatively, what would happen if someone tried to use Sparky as a defibrillator? :blink: (In real life it would probably kill you, but c'mon, you can't tell me that Sparky never shocked any of the other characters in the Stitch series!)

Hmm…maybe the MythBusters could hire Sparky to supply electricity when they're testing myths involving lightning strikes :idea …and for gratuitous blowing up of random stuff. :p

Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 9 ... 191