The Gang of Five
Howdy, everyone!

As you know, the forum has been fighting spammers and bots for years. We have seen our fair share of "Custom Kitchens UK", scammy Internet hosting companies, and bots trying to send us to a business's homepage. But after fighting the tidal wave of spam for so many years, the admins had a persistent thought: what if the spammers are right? Not in terms of posting nonsense links and trying to scam our users, but in trying to make money through our unique platform?

Well, thanks to the helpful counsel of Taunt, we have finally decided to move the forum in a new direction. Please see his important post on the matter in this topic

Tv series replacing sequals?

landbeforetimelover · 7 · 2428
« previous next »
Pages: 1

landbeforetimelover

  • Member+
  • Littlefoot
  • *
    • Posts: 8495
  • Littlefoot
    • View Profile
    • http://www.thelandbeforetime.org
on: April 19, 2007, 11:44:44 PM
I beleive that the sequals should not be replaced.  What about you?

Malte279

  • The Circle
  • The Gang of Five
  • *
    • Posts: 15598
    • View Profile
    • http://www.ineinemlandvorunsererzeit.de.vu
Reply #1 on: April 20, 2007, 04:45:13 AM
Dito on that!
All the years it was a very special event when a new LBT movie came out and it was watched, and rewatched, and discussed to the very last detail. Now that I might watch so many sequels I'm hesitant to do so feeling a little "flooded" with material we used to have to wait for a much longer time.

Littlefoot1616

  • The Circle
  • Cera
  • *
    • Posts: 3881
  • The game is on; so let's play!
    • View Profile
Reply #2 on: April 20, 2007, 07:35:24 AM
Definitely not. Seeing at the movies gave birth to the Tv series, I don't think it should become mainstream.

Petrie.

  • Hatchling
  • *
    • Posts: 0
  • It's good to be the king!
    • View Profile
Reply #3 on: April 20, 2007, 09:20:26 AM
I think Universal might be able to support a TV series in terms of plot depth than they could for a full length film.  They're on their last leg in terms of films by now.

Lain_EX

  • Ducky
  • *
    • Posts: 2049
    • View Profile
Reply #4 on: April 20, 2007, 02:03:51 PM
I think not. The TV series aren't made to replace the movies. Matter fact, some TV series are made from movies. So, I think the TV series wouldn't replace the movies.

Flathead770

  • Member+
  • Cera
  • *
    • Posts: 3138
    • View Profile
Reply #5 on: April 21, 2007, 09:21:40 PM
i don't think that the sequals will be replaced by the series

Digi-Dragon

  • Ruby
  • *
    • Posts: 12
    • View Profile
Reply #6 on: April 21, 2007, 09:36:48 PM
Well, there's already been confirmed LBT 13, right? So that means there's at least going to be one more movie.

The series is good, yeah, but I woudln't want it to replace the series. There are some little stories that can't take up a whole movie, so that's where the series comes in. It should be used to display those events that can't make it into the movie. Sequels should be used to give us a larger story that can't be explained in 22 minutes, like what they should've done with Ali's reintroduction and such. Just so long as the movies and the series don't start contradicting each other (ie, refering to things that have happened in the series, but not having Chomper and Ruby in the movie), then I'm fine with both.

Pages: 1