Noname, you must remove that award from your signature again.
No single admin can make the decision to grant an award to anyone. Such decisions require the agreement of at least three admins. Which you did not get.
There is a good example why you did not get so much attention in this vote, as you just did not participate in the whole vote. Even if every single member of the GOF had voted for you on every single award existing you would, by the rules, not be entitled to get it because you did not cast a single vote yourself. You cannot expect to be recognized without giving some recognition yourself and you, noname, just didn't.
There is another thing that you may be happy to hear but that also goes to show that your participation in the GOF is shallow in a sense. If it was not you would be aware that in fact you ARE actually entitled to one award. You joined back in 2006 and have remained active ever since. Therefore you are fully entitled to wear this award:

We take great care to prevent any arbitrary votes or any nepotism (that's one of the purposes of the explanatory lines), but giving people a good reason to vote for you on a particular award and voting yourself are the absolute preconditions to get an award in the vote. We cannot allow people to be awarded for complaining about not receiving an award.
You are fully entitled to add the award displayed in this message to your signature (as you would have known if you followed the threads in the GOF more closely), but you must remove that "honorable mention" award from your thread.
Honorable mentions themselves however may perhaps be a good idea in the signatures. I think there would be nothing wrong if people wanted to copy paste the lines of any award votes in which they and their accomplishments are mentioned to their signatures.