After reading the imdb board for the movie The Mist, I read a LOT of posts by people saying they hated the ending, finding the character's actions unrealistic and just thought it was too sad.
I started to wonder, is an ending really a bad ending just because it's unhappy?
VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F6uZs60SbAg&feature=related VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjE_N49_6Lw (The ending to the movie, for reference.) In the director's commentary for the Mist, the director pointed out that at least one person begged him to change the ending after a test screening.
It really surprises me that some people (children excluded of course) can't handle an unhappy ending to something, and this, especially in the cases of movies, often results in the ending being changed.
A notable example of an alteration is the movie version of the Little Shop of Horrors musical:
VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VYeq6QsaAIM VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6QmD0UBFoeo&feature=related This is the happy ending that exists only in the movie version.
VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xaBJDRIgJRY&feature=related VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUiz4WgTB7c&feature=related VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddIK3CIMzFs&feature=related (The dark ending that is more faithful to the play's ending. It was changed after unfavorable reactions by test audiences. However, in the movie's case, there has been a reason some fans felt that, even if they prefer the unhappy ending, that the happy theatrical ending works: The movie makes changes to Seymour's character, where in the play he is more unsympathetic while the movie makes it seems like he regrets his actions earlier on, so in the movie version his character doesn't deserve his fate. And pretty much everyone hated to see Audrey die.
Oddly, I've seen cases where the inverse has happened. The original Final Destination, for example, ends with an equivalent of the "villain's still alive" ending, with the design going into a loop and ending right before Carter is seen dying. However, the original ending was different, and much more conclusive:
VIDEO http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdJXktPhRJE This ending didn't do well with audiences because they hated seeing Alex dying and Carter living, even though Carter's clearly changed and stopped being a jerk in the original ending. Hilariously, letting Alex live through till the end was rendered completely pointless by Final Destination 2, which states he died off-screen between the movies. The original ending is arguably one of the more happier endings I've seen for a horror film, though it is bittersweet. Nevertheless, it is far more conclusive and had it been used, there may not have been a sequel.
What do you guys think? Goes an unhappy ending=a bad ending? What do you think of the examples I've listed?