Part of the reason I wat Harry Potter re-made is so that I can see a truer adaption of the books. What's wonderful about LBT, however, is that it's simply LBT, and not an adaption of any story. It's true to itself!
The one thing that would seemingly make it perfect would be the deleted scenes...except, with those, it wouldn't be the exact same LBT we grew up knowing and loving.
So why re-make it? If anything, a re-make would likely get the same criticism from fans of the original that the Harry Potter movies got from fans of the books. If anything strayed from the original movie (e.g. modernisms in dialogue, changes in characters) fans would be unhappy, and if it was exactly like the original, fans would complain that they wasted their time just watching a carbon CGI copy of a film that's much truer and purer in it's original format.
So no, I think it's safest if LBT stays a timeless classic that is untouched. Plus...if they were to remake it, wouldn't
new score have to be composed?! Can you imagine, for a moment, LBT
without James Horner's incredible score!? :!
Basically, my hopes are of someday getting a long, epic CGI film set in the prehistoric world that is as good as the original LBT (I can't say "Dinosaur" did it for me) and this classic staying an untouched piece of our childhood.
I respect the opinions anyone who thinks otherwise, however.
