@StardustSoldier: I really like the idea of ambiguity actually. That was one concept that completely flew over me while making my initial review, and it totally makes sense. Intentionally making the fruit a pear and not including the flyer to give viewers different interpretations and thoughts on
who is exactly the character in question that tried to make Littlefoot feel better made things a bit more interesting. It’s not concrete and select, as art really shouldn’t be in my opinion — but more like three dimensional if you get what I’m saying. Bonus points for this Stardust.

Yeah, I know what you mean. Eventually you’ll get to the advanced art works. I know you can do it. Just take it step by step and get as much advice as you possibly can.

In what ways do you feel he could've been drawn better?
Don’t lose faith in humanity for this, but...Littlefoot is too much of a flathead in this drawing in my opinion.

But in all seriousness, more roundness at the top of his head would look better, plus it wouldn’t look like a chunk of his head is missing. Well...even though the original scene shows a flathead like that, it just looks weird in my opinion here. It’s up to you whether to take this criticism or not, because it does closely resemble what the original scene showed. I think that’s probably all I have to say in terms of explaining what I think can be improved, although perhaps my previous ambiguous critique regarding Littlefoot would fill in the holes and gaps.
Sometimes I wish I could explain more, but the thought just gets stuck in my head and I can’t get it out. Maybe there’s something else to be improved on, maybe not. But somehow, some other parts of the drawing may still bother me. You get what I’m saying?

You’re having fun making LBT art, right Stardust?
