Rest assured that at least 3 out of five admins would have to be "corrupted" for anyone to get banned as a consequence. We imposed rules not just on our members, but also on ourselves. A single admin may not ban a member (with the only exception of the kind of porno side spambots already mentioned above) but can only temporarily suspend a member until the staff has come to a decision. If there are less than three out of five votes in favor of a ban it won't happen. Those bans we have had so far were all unanimous and nobody has been banned without a previous warning and / or suspension along with a message telling him about which rule violations he committed and the urge to change that kind of attitude. If in spite of all that members continue to break the rules thereby harming the GOF the point is reached where, for the good of the community, the admins will make a decision about whether or not to ban a member. Apart from this regularized procedure we also take the individual case into account of course (e.g. how severe the rule breaks are, if other members had been directly affected, and if the rule breaks were conducted deliberately or possibly out of ignorance (no warning message goes without a link to the board rules though, so nobody who repeatedly breaks the rules can claim ignorance)).