Lately, I'm really fed up with Microsoft. I absolutely hate all of their newest products. IE7, Office 2001, Windows Vista, and now they're trying to totally take control of the net with some new form of online server technology. In the past, Microsoft made very little mistakes. The only real big mistake it has ever made was windows ME, but that was fixed in under a year with windows XP. I must say that Microsoft has got it all wrong. Vista, IE7, and Office 2007 all follow the same basic theme: Make it look pretty and disregard how many resources it takes up. Visual appeal is paramount. Screw the usability and what the user really wants. Let's just make it look pretty and worry about the other stuff later.
It's not working for me at all and I must say it's not working for most of the world that uses computers. I mean, office 2007 uses up like 512mb of ram just starting and for what? It's got some cool buttons and an annoying cartoon-like user interface. I can't emphasize this enough: PEOPLE NEED TO USE THEIR COMPUTERS FOR WORK!!!
Mac has got it all right. They make it look good without impeding the user experience. Vista needs to use a MAX of 256mb of ram, 500mhz, and take up less than 5gb AND it needs to actually be usable at it's minimum requirements! IE7 is nothing but a crapload of annoying security garbage to protect computer illiterate people from stuff they don't need to be protected from. They totally changed the UI (user interface). I have just one question: WHY??? If it worked before, why change it? Microsoft has just made it slow, non-forgiving of coding mistakes, and just a pile of garbage. Office 2007 uses up so many resources and it's so ugly! Why not just make it like office 2003? Menus work fine. I remember the days when getting your work done didn't take 10 years even on a state of the art computer. Even brand new Vista machines take like 5 whole minutes to boot when they've got nothing on them! If you've got more than 1.4ghz single core and a gig of ram, your computer should be fast as hell. It should boot in around 30 seconds and be fast at just about everything. I don't understand this. Why doesn't Microsoft get this?